Noces( A Wedding: Luxembourg : French:2016): Patriarchy Snowballed
WATCH THE TRAILER HERE: NOCES TRAILER
Patriarchy, like all
other forms of oppression , continually changes and adapts itself to squeeze
into a more contemporary and dynamic worldview, to slowly expand from inside
and finally burst the fabric of a modern liberal society. This elaborate,
snowball-ish journey of patriarchy has been traced with a multi-dimensional
complexity which shoots off as a tiny embryo (quite literally), in the French
film ‘Noces (A Wedding)’.
The opening scene of
the film starts out with the protagonist, Zahira (Lina El Arabi) discussing
with her gynecologist the procedure as well as the dangers of aborting her
fetus. The viewers might, initially, be tempted to think of it as a piece
dealing with the pro-choice/pro-‘life’ debate, but this naïve and simple
assumption is soon displaced with a deeper understanding of Zahira’s life as
the plot unravels.
Zahira is a
Pakistani teenager living in Belgium who finds herself stuck with being
pregnant after a night of un-protected sex with her Pakistani-immigrant
boyfriend. Zahira lives with her deeply conservative parents (played by Indian
Actor Neena Kulkarni and Babak Karimi) and two siblings. When Zahira’s family
comes to know of her pregnancy, they dictate their wish to have the fetus
aborted and to marry Zahira off to a ‘suitable’ Pakistani groom.
She confides into
her elder brother Amir and, Amir, though supportive of her decision seems to be
reluctant expressing his discomfort over the abortion.
Zahira then goes off
to meet her boyfriend and asks him to talk to her parents about their wish to
getting her married. But as expected, the boyfriend turns down her wish. A
positive departure that we witness here from classic old bollywood films where
the girl would probably have pleaded to her boyfriend, ‘to give the child his
name’, Zahira takes matters into her own hands and decides to discontinue her
relationship with her petulant boyfriend, rather affirmatively.
The first turning
point of the film comes when Zahira is in the hospital in the middle of the
pregnancy termination procedure. While the doctor is ready to operate on her,
we see her getting uncomfortable and realizing that this abortion was never
really her choice. She decides to stop the procedure mid way and leave the
operation theatre. When she emerges out of the room, we see her brother Amir
waiting in the reception area while watching something attentively on his
laptop. What might have seemed as a trivial scene in a film dealing with forced
marriages and sexual explorations is actually a scene with heavier
consequences.
Amir is revealed to
be watching a very famous Bollywood song ‘tinku jiya’ and then we see Zahira
running towards her home while the same song plays in the background. While
this particular scene baffled many audiences with its execution, (a
cringe-worthy Bollywood song being played in a French film set in Belgium- Yes you
read it right) the intent seemed to reach across quite clear. The scene intends
to show how Bollywwod’s internalized misogyny is so widespread and penetrative
that it snowballs into the film’s climax (many scenes later).
After this, the film
deals with a lot of issues that plague the Pakistani community living in Belgium.
On the one hand they are forced to physically be present in a modern and
liberal atmosphere; on the other hand they can’t really seem to get rid of
their traditionally regressive customs reeking of inherent patriarchy. Zahira’s
parents offer her with three choices of Pakistani grooms (each choice
accompanied with a creepy picture) while her mother, oblivious to the blatant irony
in her statement, tells her “You should
feel lucky. At least we are progressive enough to provide you choices. I was
married to your father even without asking. At least we are asking you to
choose from these three”.
After various skype calls with the prospective grooms,
Zahira is forced to narrow down to one and is then forcibly engaged to him (that
too on Skype). The scene showing the video conversations are examples of
excellent screenwriting where the writer has beautifully presented the dilemma
of an orthodox family being forced, so as to say, to give up their customs one
at a time. However, one custom that stands the test of time and is further
manifested and facilitated through technology as we see, is patriarchy.
We also see a
parallel track where Zahira’s friend expresses his love for her subtly ,in
differently layered scenes, and while she is shown to like him too, she is
forced to think otherwise because now she’s engaged to someone else (even if it’s
through Skype). Midway through the narrative, we see Zahira walking again
inside the hospital and returning to her childhood friend telling her that she
has finally taken ‘her own decision’ to terminate the pregnancy.
Just before Zahira
is to be flown to Pakistan to get her married to her fiancé, she runs away from
her house with her French boyfriend and starts living with him. But the
narrative isn’t done with the monster of patriarchy yet. Zahira’s younger
sister calls her home to meet her one last time when no other family member
would be present. Zahira agrees to this demand and returns to her home one last
time to meet her younger sister. But, we see her brother Amir waiting instead
who hugs her instantly. We believe that a ‘change of heart’ scene is possibly
coming our way. But all our dreams of a ‘happy ending’ are shattered when we
see Amir pulling out his revolver and killing Zahira. ra.
There, our monster
of patriarchy has succeeded in staying relevant in a liberal country like
Belgium. The snowball effect of subtly packaged patriarchy helps the narrative
convert a seemingly trivial problem (of internalized misogyny) into a full
blown monster towards the end.
All in all, ‘Noces’
is a fantastically well written tale about old school patriarchy and how it has
managed to stay relevant in today’s , apparently, changing modern world. It’s a
must watch for people who try to negate the presence of sexism and misogyny in
supposedly liberal countries. And moreover it’s an urge for every one of us to
not just look at the surface but move deeper into newer and alternative
realities, because patriarchy already has.
As it was based on the Sadia Sheikh case, this means Amir single-handedly ruined his entire family. If he thought it was bad being dishonored in Pakistan, it'll be even worse to find that he, his older sister, and his parents are all going to jail in Belgium. In the Sheikh case the parents and brother claimed that only the brother decided to kill Sadia, but the courts ruled that the parents and sister were also responsible and they got prison time. Likewise Mansoor and Yelda Kazim are going to jail and will probably die there, Amir is going to be unemployable going out, and I would imagine the courts would adopt Amara to a non-Pakistani family who will stress that what her parents and brother did were morally wrong.
ReplyDeleteThank you for this information as I was not aware of this! :)
Delete